首页> 外文OA文献 >Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth
【2h】

Three dimensions of oppositionality in youth

机译:青年中对抗性的三个维度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background:  Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) in youth is a strong predictor of mental illness yet the wide range of associations with psychiatric disorders remains largely unexplained. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the identification of irritable, headstrong and hurtful dimensions within youth oppositionality would clarify the pattern of associations between oppositionality and a wide range of psychopathology in early and adult life.Methods:  Cross-sectional data from national mental health surveys including 18,415 subjects aged 5–16 in the United Kingdom. The main outcome measures were the associations between a priori hypothesised dimensions of oppositionality with psychiatric disorders and symptoms; parent and teacher-derived information were used in multivariate regression analysis.Results:  Our three a priori dimensions had very different associations with disorders and symptom scales. Irritability was the only predictor of emotional disorders (parent report: OR = 3.26 [CI 95% 2.79, 3.80]; teacher report: OR = 2.78 [2.39, 3.22]); the hurtful dimension was particularly strongly associated with seeming cold-blooded or callous (parent report: β = .32 [.27, .37]; teacher report: .33 [.30, .36]); and the headstrong dimension was most strongly associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; parent report: OR = 3.21 [2.43, 4.23]; teacher report : OR = 7.18 [5.25, 9.82]). All three dimensions were associated with conduct disorder, with the headstrong dimension being the main predictor of non-aggressive symptoms (parent report: β = .31 [.27, .34]; teacher report: .43 [.40, .45]), and with the hurtful dimension being the main predictor of aggressive symptoms (parent report: β = .35 [.32, .39]; teacher report: .40 [.39, .42]).Conclusions:  The three dimensions of oppositionality have distinctive external correlates, suggesting they may also be differential predictors of aetiology, prognosis and treatment responsiveness.
机译:背景:青年时期的反抗性违抗症(ODD)是精神疾病的有力预测指标,但与精神疾病的广泛关联仍然无法解释。这项研究的目的是调查在青年对抗性中识别出易怒,顽强和伤害性维度是否能阐明早期和成人生活中对抗性与广泛的心理病理学之间的关联模式。方法:national来自国家精神病学的横断面数据健康调查,包括英国18,415位5至16岁的受试者。主要结局指标是先验假设的对抗性与精神疾病和症状之间的关联。结果:我们的三个先验维度与障碍和症状量表的关联非常不同。易怒是情绪障碍的唯一预测因子​​(父母报告:OR = 3.26 [CI 95%2.79,3.80];教师报告:OR = 2.78 [2.39,3.22]);伤害的维度尤其与看似冷血或call的人密切相关(父母报告:β= 0.32 [.27,.37];教师报告:.33 [.30,.36]);而正负维度与注意力不足多动障碍最密切相关(ADHD;父母报告:OR = 3.21 [2.43,4.23];教师报告:OR = 7.18 [5.25,9.82])。这三个维度均与行为障碍有关,坚强维度是非攻击性症状的主要预测因子(父母报告:β= .31 [.27,.34];教师报告:.43 [.40,.45] ),而伤害维度是攻击性症状的主要预测因子(父母报告:β= .35 [.32,.39];教师报告:.40 [.39,.42])。结论:对抗性具有独特的外部相关性,表明它们也可能是病因,预后和治疗反应性的差异预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号